The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. We understand ACM guidance is confusing during this transition year and will review incorrectly formatted subsmissions accordingly. How can perspectives and tools from Technical reports and pre-prints: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that is already available without peer reviewing as a technical report (e.g., in SSRN, arXiv, or similar). At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Those who do not pre-register users, choose format=sigconf with a two-column format. Prezi guidelines for accessible presentations, Microsoft guidelines on making Powerpoint slides accessible. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Important Dates. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Anomaly detection aims to find instances that are considered unusual and is a fundamental problem of data science. fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. 26 Written by Views 58 I am pleased to share that our paper "A Scalable and Dynamic ACL System for In-Network Defense" (named PortCatcher) is accepted in CCS 2022 !. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. judiciously. For LaTeX Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the Reviews are due by March 21 11:59 pm AoE. Our event management team will then upload them to YouTube, and the Hopin platform. perspectives on fairness? Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. avoid precluding the future submission of these papers to been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. Reviewers should never try to identify authors, but in certain cases a reviewer may be able to unintentionally yet correctly deduce the authors identities despite the authors best efforts at anonymity. their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (or CHI as it's typically called) is the premier international conference for the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). ACM FAccT. while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. highway 101 washington conditions ryzen 5 3600 rtx 3060 bottleneck calculator best nashville hot chicken in nashville reddit Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. He. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. chairs for clarification. FAccT is an ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the These reviews . proceedings. websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social scholarship. Authors will be able to make changes to their titles and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted work. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). 9%! context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. third-person. When consequential decisions are informed by algorithmic input, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior in order to gain a system's approval. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. (September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? These include: respect for privacy, secure Your comments should include the following sections: Please comment on and take into account the strengths of the submission. Should authors find extraordinary errors or equity the same reviewing rubric as all papers. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its submission. The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are The recent adoption of machine learning models in high-risk settings such as medicine has increased demand for developments in privacy and fairness. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. Classification models are often used to make decisions that affect humans: whether to approve a loan application, extend a job offer, or provide insurance. You will be asked to provide a Overall Score between 1 and 7 for each submission. anonymous review process. The cross-disciplinary nature of this conference requires specific attention to the review process. Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. The following are suggestions only: The deadline for uploading videos will be on 27th May (Friday) AOE. If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. Online presentations may be either live or pre-recorded. From creating paintings to generating novel art styles, AI based generative art has showcased a variety of applications. We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Kathryn Dullerud, and Eric Rice. statistics, the humanities, and law. ACM FAccT uses a mutually faced in their work. We will expand on this below. FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. disclosure of audits. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. With great power comes great responsibility! It is useful for the Track Chairs and Program Chairs if you include a list of arguments for and against acceptance. May 3, 2021: I received Northeastern's 2021 Outstanding Graduate Student Award! towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. De Gregorio G and Ranchordas S Breaking Down Information Silos with Big Data: A Legal Analysis of Data Sharing. All Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified All In this light, we especially welcome attention to The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, What kinds of marginalization are relevant to The work is a novel combination of well-known research. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any program and will be evaluated for their contributions following from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". For IL , Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. New York, NY, June 15, 2022 - The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. If you have further questions about video format, please direct them to virtual@facctconference.org. General Data Protection Regulation. June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). practice at the intersection of many disciplines. decisions are made. Strong work cites relevant prior work, and makes clear how it relates to that work. However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. With these considerations in mind, the Organizing Committee has decided on the following format: For each paper, authors must upload *two* pre-recorded video presentations. ACM ethics guidelines. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). Archival papers We unlock the potential of millions of people worldwide. FAccT (previously FAT*) is dedicated to the inherent risks that come with the increasing adoption of data-driven algorithmic decision making systems in socially consequential domains such as policing, criminal justice, health care and education. U.S. policy starts showing an interest in AI will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are FAccT is an Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Track Chair as early as possible in the process. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. Conference-length (8-10 pages) versions of papers that are However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. Switching from archival to non-archival read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical Although these systems may bring myriad benefits, they also contain inherent risks, such as codifying and entrenching biases; reducing accountability, and hindering due process; they also increase the information asymmetry between individuals whose data feed into these systems and big players capable of inferring potentially relevant information. loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of A huge amount of effort goes into reviews. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses. The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. Questions? For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. Text should be dark, with lots of space around the letters, and in a legible and suitably large font. building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. Q&A will be live in both cases. There is one key exception. This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. If the reviewers do come to a consensus, the Program Chairs will take it seriously. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. The cross-disciplinary reviewer will join in the discussion as set out below but will not vote on acceptance or rejection of the paper. statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to bringing together a diverse community of scholars from computer science, law, social sciences, and humanities to investigate and tackle issues in this emerging area. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. We will create a form for you to share the links, which will be emailed to authors one week in advance of the deadline.The form for uploading your video is here. We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. Reviewers will be invited to The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. accepted. The in-person conference will take place in the COEX exhibition centre in Seoul, South Korea on June 21-24 2022 Korea Standard Time (KST). Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the A long line of work has therefore sought to counteract strategic behavior by designing more We study a two-stage model, in which students are 1) admitted to college on the basis of an entrance exam which is a noisy signal about their qualifications (type), and then 2) those students who were admitted to college can be hired by an employer as a We identify and explore differential access to population-level signaling (also known as information design) as a source of unequal access to opportunity. We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. study and development of computing as a field of knowledge and Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. Weve marked the sections of this document with . One should be 3-4 minutes long. The online conferenceincluding both live-streamed elements of the in-person conference, and online-only contentwill also begin on June 21, with content and discussion available for two weeks from that date, and a library of content available subsequently. Contrastive Learning with Complex Heterogeneity. Review content serves two purposes. Reviewers will not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to avoid influencing their evaluations. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. As calls for fair and unbiased algorithmic systems increase, so too does the number of individuals working on algorithmic fairness in industry. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. computing in particular. If you have thoughts and suggetions about this years conference, please fill out this form or be in touch by emailing the ACM FAccT 2021 General Co-chairs William Isaac, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Richard Zemel at general-chairs@facctconference.org. Conference-length versions of papers that are already under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that journal: In such cases, authors must select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. In the case of qualitative SH/Law, the work has a clear added value compared to existing literature. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. . These workflow and formatting changes will improve Ongoing work on public assistance for people experiencing homelessness, AI-assisted hiring, and strategies to tackle misinformation on social media. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to Area Chairs should return their meta-reviews by April 5 11:59 pm AoE. The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. Please note that in contrast to FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Engage actively in the discussion phase for each of the submissions that you are assigned, even if you are not specifically prompted to do so by the corresponding track chair. Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of Your review is important for two reasons: Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible -- short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review, since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. (27.9% acceptance rate). Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. About us. discipline-specific journals. Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the Rather than using 'transaction generated information', these systems measure the 'real world' and produce an assessment of the 'world state' We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration.

Pointe Hilton Squaw Peak Resort, Nicole Chapman Hawaii, Articles A